翻訳と辞書 Words near each other ・ R v Journeymen-Taylors of Cambridge ・ R v K ・ R v Kang-Brown ・ R v Kapp ・ R v Keegstra ・ R v Kewelram ・ R v Khan ・ R v Khan (South Africa) ・ R v Khelawon ・ R v Kirby; Ex parte Boilermakers' Society of Australia ・ R v Korsten ・ R v Kouri ・ R v Krymowski ・ R v Laba ・ R v Labaye ・ R v Ladouceur ・ R v Latimer ・ R v Latimer (1997) ・ R v Lavallee ・ R v Lawrence ・ R v Leary ・ R v Licensing Court of Brisbane; Ex parte Daniell ・ R v Lifchus ・ R v Lipman ・ R v Loubser ・ R v Lovelass ・ R v Lucas ・ R v M (MR) ・ R v Mabula ・ R v Malmo-Levine; R v Caine Dictionary Lists mini英和辞書 mini和英辞書 Webster 1913 Latin-English FOLDOC Wikipedia English ウィキペディア

翻訳と辞書　辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ] スポンサード リンク R v Ladouceur ： ウィキペディア英語版 R v Ladouceur ''R v Ladouceur'', () 1 S.C.R. 1257 is a leading decision of the Supreme Court of Canada on the constitutionality of random police traffic checks. The Court found that the random checks violated the right not to be arbitrarily detained or imprisoned under section 9 of the ''Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms''. However, the violation was saved under section 1 as it was a valid form of deterrence for a pressing problem of traffic safety. ==Background== Gerald Ladouceur was pulled over by the police as part of a random traffic check. The police discovered that he was driving with a suspended licence. He was convicted of driving without a licence. Ladouceur challenged the provision of the ''Highway Traffic Act'' which authorized the police officers to do random traffic checks as a violation of sections 7, 8, and 9 of the ''Charter''. The conviction was upheld on appeal. 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「R v Ladouceur」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.